All contentArticle
Managing false positives systematically
Build a consistent review structure without letting name similarity overwhelm operations.
A false positive is a potential match created by name similarity that is assessed as a different person or organization after contextual review.
Improve quality before thresholds
Normalizing input, preserving aliases and collecting strong identifiers improve review quality. Lowering a threshold alone may increase the risk of missed matches.
Use precedent with context
Prior decisions can accelerate research, but a changed customer or list record requires renewed review. Every closure rationale should be explicit and verifiable.
The right objective is not zero alerts; it is a manageable review queue aligned with the organization’s risk approach.